Past-life therapy
Past-life
therapy is regression therapy accepting that scenes from apparent past
lives may emerge. Regression therapy derives its name from its method:
recovering and reliving past experiences cathartically. Though reliving
cathartically is sometimes sufficient, regression proper often has to be
complemented by working with subpersonalities, sometimes called
egostate therapy: having the present personality communicate with the
child or the past life that had the traumatic experience. In the present
lifetime, this work is called Inner Child work, in past lifetimes, this
is called working with pseudo-obsessors: treating and integrating
disturbing past-life personalities.
The second complement of
regression is bio-energetically: discovering and processing old residues
- including those from past lives - that clutter our system and that we
still may experience physically. Regression therapy in the wide sense
includes Inner Child work and bio-energetic work, and the same holds for
past-life therapy.
So past-life therapy is an expanded and
specialized form of regression therapy. What should a broad regression
therapist who works in this life only, have to learn extra to become a
broad past-life therapist?
* Guiding death experiences, including what happens immediately after death up till the life review, if any.
* Guiding the life preparation, including planning, preview and choice of parents.
* Discovering and processing past-life elements in experiences
from this lifetime, including prenatal experiences in the womb, that
explain mental and emotional responses in this life.
Both
working with subpersonalities and working bio-energetically, often may
lead to discovering what those two field respectively call attachments
and foreign energies: charges, subpersonalities and even complete
personalities of others. In the last case, we deal with attachment by
deceased people. Sometimes, attachments appear to come from people we
knew in a previous lifetime. Consequentially, past-life therapy includes
removing karmic attachments.
In regressing to infancy, birth and
the time in the womb, children often respond, consider and decide in a
way that betrays an adult background, an adult awareness. Like adults
have Inner Children, children have Inner Adults. Past-life therapists
take those Inner Adults seriously and discover in them previous
lifetimes or conclusions and decisions from the intermission between
death and rebirth. When processing an apparently relevant childhood
trauma gives only half results, past-life therapy will go farther back.
Past-life
therapy is generally short therapy, though the sessions are longer and
more intensive than is usual in psychotherapy. Denys Kelsey, who could
compare past-life therapy with his previous work as a psychiatrist and
to the work of his colleagues, said (Graham 1976), "In a maximum of
twelve hours of regression therapy, I can accomplish what will take a
psychoanalyst three years."
The research of Rabia Clark (1995)
shows that most therapists (74%) combine working in past lives with
other methods and forms of therapy. Most frequently mentioned are NLP
(52%), hypnotherapy - including the Ericksonian hypnotherapy (37 %), and
Gestalt (20%). Meanwhile, Inner Child work will also belong in this
shortlist. Many therapists (26%) also do past-life therapy with
children, from about eight years of age. The main motives are childhood
fears and phobias. Other motives are bed-wetting, dyslexia, depression,
anger and hyperactivity. Some work with even younger children, in fact
from the time they begin to speak. Carol Bowman (2000) gives examples of
both mothers and young children.
How often do patients relate
previous lifetimes if asked to return to the first cause of their
problem? About one third of my patients, after an open suggestion,
arrive in a past life, about one third remain in this life, and about
one third relive childhood events that appear to be restimulations of
older traumas. Shakuntala Modi found, with more serious patients, that
70% had symptoms originating from past lives. Brian Weiss (1993) found
that about 40% of his patients had to go to past lives to solve their
problems:
Regression to an earlier period of this present-day
lifetime is usually fruitful enough for most of the remainder. For those
first 40 percent, however, regression to previous lifetimes is key to a
cure. The best therapist working within the classically accepted limits
of the single life-time will not be able to effect a complete cure for
the patient whose symptoms were caused by a trauma that occurred in a
previous lifetime, perhaps hundreds or even thousands of years ago. But
when past life therapy is used to bring these long-repressed memories to
awareness, improvement in the current symptoms is usually swift and
dramatic.
Some patients prefer to indulge in past lives while
they resist confronting bad feelings and bad experiences from their
childhood. On the average, working in this lifetime is emotionally more
taxing. Working in past lifetimes usually is mentally more taxing, and
the somatics are probably more intense while working in past lives,
except for reliving serious physical trauma in this life, like accidents
or violence.
Indications and counter indications
For
what kind of problems people seek past-life therapy? Or when do
therapists who have more options, apply this therapy? We have ample
information on this: a survey in 1988 among the members of APRT, the
professional association in the USA, a similar survey among the members
of the NVRT, the professional association in the Netherlands, the survey
of Rabia Clark in 1995. Garritt Oppenheim (1990), Hans TenDam (1993)
and Shakuntala Modi (1998) also present lists. The big four of motives
for past-life therapy appear to be:
1. Fears and phobias.
2. Relationship problems and problems of connecting with people in general.
3. Depressions.
4. Physical complaints without medical explanation or not responding to medical care.
After those four, the most common other motives are:
5. Sexual problems.
6. Addictions.
7. Obesity and eating disorders.
Oppenheim
and Ten Dam mention uncontrollable anger as a motive and Oppenheim
gives some interesting specific motives like writer's block and stage
fright (Oppenheim 1990).
What problems and which patients are
unfit for regression and past-life therapy? The first condition for
regression therapy is that we can communicate with the patient. We
cannot do regression therapy with patients who we cannot talk to because
they are mentally too retarded, too heavily drugged, too psychotic - so
they cannot hold on to their own thoughts and feelings, or the reverse:
they cannot let go of them, or because they are too autistic. For
regression we need people who can explore their thoughts and feelings
and can distinguish fact and fiction. Few psychotics qualify.
Morris
Netherton considers working with schizophrenics possible, but only
within an institution. He starts with imagination and gradually moves to
real regression. It works, but slowly and limited. With autistic
children he had no success. An alcoholic has to be free from alcohol for
about three days to regress successfully. People using barbiturates or
other tranquillizers have to detoxify before starting regression
therapy.
Roger Woolger considers working in past lives for many
too intense. They have no need to reopen old sores in their psyche, but
need a personal, therapeutic relationship to rebuild their confidence in
life and in themselves. Others find it difficult to visualize and to
internalize. Oppenheim mention as counter indications (1990):
* patients with acute anxiety attacks,
* those acutely confused,
* those in acute depression,
* those with severe acute psychotic symptoms.
* patients who ask for hypnosis to stop smoking or lose weight or
improve their golf scores or achieve similar goals - they can nearly
always attain their goals without deep-level probing,
* patients deeply rooted in religious teachings who back away of reincarnation,
* macho patients (including women) scoffing at anything mystical or paranormal as 'crackpot' or 'weirdo.'
Patients may be neurotic, tremble with fear, hear voices, have multiple
personalities, are depressive, suicidal or murderous. As long as they
want to work, as long as they assume responsibility, we can work with
them. We cannot work with dependent people. Assuming responsibility is a
condition for any therapy that is insight-oriented.
People with
‘patient mentality’, even after apparently successful regressions,
hardly improve. People addicted to their suffering are rather cases for
'antitherapy', jolting them out of the standard patient - therapist
relationship. Others are walking case files: they regurgle all their
previous diagnoses and can talk about themselves only in psychobabble or
psychiatric jargon.
Also people who refuse to be patients are
unfit. They refuse suffering in all its forms (they have forgotten to
feel, as feeling is too painful or too threatening), and so are unfit
for explorative, insight-oriented therapies. They refuse to relax and
want to interpret, comment and rationalize anything remotely resembling a
significant experience or emotion. Who cannot live, cannot relive.
Interesting as an intellectual ball game, but a dead-end road to
catharsis. People who want to get rid of their problems without finding
out the causes, sometimes may be helped by antitherapy or paradoxical
therapy, and often by behavioral therapy or classical hypnotherapy.
For
many, past-life therapy still has a sensational ring and so it attracts
professional sufferers who want to add it to their collection of
near-hits. Also, past-life therapy is mainly known in alternative,
spiritual circles. Many have been told by people who just discovered
they are psychic, that they have a hole in their aura because in a past
life they dabbled in black magic. People who visited others to hear
things about themselves, expect a therapist to do the same. They don’t
come to do produce, but to consume. Or they want psychic surgery. They
want to be hypnotized and come back to their senses when everything is
over. Or they want to witness a miracle healing. The worst assume they
are entitled to that. They have suffered enough and they pray so
seriously for being healed. Others want to hear that they are a special,
an uncommonly difficult case.
Only few past-life therapists like
to work with drug addicts. They get images, but usually both chaotic
and tedious. It seems as if their tapes have come loose and are
entangled. Scientologists believe that each drug is tied to a specific
emotion, and they rigorously pursue the separate emotion lines one by
one.
Ten suitable motives for regression therapy and past-life therapy are:
* Old anguish: paralyzing fear, roaring despair, waves of grief,
mountains of sorrow, maddening confusion. This comes from old traumas
that we track down and resolve with straight regression.
* Be
stuck. See no way out. Simmering impotent rage. Next to straight
regression (often to death experiences or long incarcerations), bodily
work (like acupressure) and bioenergetic interventions are indicated,
till freedom has been won back and the blocked energy flows again.
* Loneliness and desolation. This requires regression to the
beginning of these feelings and especially to before that: homing.
* Inhibition. Never mingling easily. Feeling an outsider, a
spectator. Feeling clumsy, shy, withdrawn. Often guilt or shame are
involved, real or talked into. Personification (working with
subpersonalities), mainly Inner Child work, is indicated.
* Submissiveness. Over-adapting to others. Lack of assertiveness. Not being able to stand in your own space and energy.
* Be lost. Having lost the way or not knowing what way to take.
* The body resists. Physical complaints without medical cause or not responding to medical treatment.
* Ineffective insight. We know what the problem is, we know what to do. But nothing changes
* Relationship problems. Being entangled with somebody else. Efforts to disentangle are in vain.
* Self-discovery. The search for unknown, undiscovered parts of
ourselves or unsuspected talents. Curiosity. Free explorations rather
than therapy.
Past-life therapy often helps where other forms of
psychotherapy halt. Its methodical basis: regression, is simple. Lay
hypnotists can quickly score, though objections can be made against
that. Practitioners at least have to be able to establish relationships
of trust, to counsel, and to deal with emotions. And they need practical
wisdom. A background in psychology and in other forms of psychotherapy
is desirable.
Regressions and personifications quickly uncover
the source of most problems. Who wants to work with those methods, but
doesn’t believe in real past-life or prenatal experiences, may consider
those experiences as diagnostic psychodrama and treat it as such. As
long as the experiences are taken seriously as experiences.
A
seasoned therapist can at many different moments during reliving and
processing apply other psychotherapeutic insights or methods. Practical
knowledge of e.g. Individual Psychology or Gestalt Therapy is desirable.
Past-life therapy can be combined profitably with other
insight-oriented forms of psychotherapy. Just finding and repeating and
releasing traumatic experiences and close of with positive suggestion,
often helps, but is too limited a repertory for a practicing past-life
therapist.
Past-life
therapy always starts just as regression therapy. Traumas, postulates or
hangovers also originate in the present life, and pseudo-obsessions may
come from multiple personalities. The only really specific elements in
past-life therapy, compared to present-life regressions, are dealing
with afterdeath and prebirth issues. With hangovers this is often
necessary, with pseudo-obsessions always.
Introductory
relaxation, visualization or hypnosis are usually a waste of time. The
only thing that counts, is to find the right “bridge”, the most natural
entry. The simplest bridge that is sufficient as an induction is
localizing an actual emotion in the body. But for many people, emotions
are remote or their body is remote. As many traumas, hangovers and
pseudo-obsessions have some postulates tied in, we can use those as
entry points. Postulates are embodied in key sentences. Repetition of
the key sentence often unlocks the underlying problem.
Over the
emotional bridge, somatic bridge or postulate bridge we can uncover
those four types of problems. While dealing with them, we’ll find out to
what extent they originated where. Sometimes we first need to resolve
the traumatic death of the preceding life, before the patient can work
on childhood problems, but the other way round may be more common.
Five different schools of past-life therapy
Practitioners in this field conceive of it in five different ways:
1.
Real reliving is unnecessary. People only need to know what
happened. If they cannot remember, we ask the higher self, interview a
guide, or somebody else can see it for them. The knowledge gained often
is used in a religious way: admonishment, prayer, forgiving ourselves
and others, etc.
2. People have to relive, but not in full. They
only have to understand what happened. If, unfortunately, reliving
becomes difficult, tense or painful, we get them out and have them
replay everything from a distance, without having to feel the impact.
Like an American colleague said: "Reliving trauma is only
retraumatizing."
3. Full reliving is in itself healing.
4. Full reliving is the first step only. Repetitions are necessary till the traumatic episode is being relived calmly.
5.
Full reliving is necessary, but only new understanding brings full
release. The original experience remains charged, but appears in a new
light. People are no longer burdened. They are unstuck.
The first
approach is not true past-life therapy, but a psychic consult telling
people what they have done or experienced in past lives that explains
why they are not radiantly happy today. The consult may be complemented
by psychic treatment like Reiki, aura healing or chakra healing. For
people who cannot work themselves (autistics, psychotics, retards,
infants) a godsend. For people who do not want to work (professional
patients and professional consumers) an escape. For people who want to
work and who can work a delay - and a handicap, as they cannot enter
later sessions with an open mind. Franklin Loehr wrote in Psychography:
The
clinician himself is not -- repeat NOT - to use regression therapy of
his clients for his own psychic development. The client's past-life
recall is his experience. For the clinician to "feel along with it," to
psychically pick it up or even to precognitize it, detracts from the
quality of the client's experience. I learned this early. I have 40
years experience as a psychic channel . . . but I scrupulously keep my
work with a recall client to that of a clinician and counselor only. I
remember speaking for a group of regression therapists, and overhearing
one boast how he could "go along all the way" with his client. No! Your
client pays you to be a skillful psychotherapist, not a sidewalk
fortuneteller.
In the Netherlands, quite a number of people
advertise themselves as past-life therapist, and then tell you about
your previous lives. It is rarely useful, often the reverse. In Japan,
Hiroshi Motoyama works this way. Just like many of his colleagues in the
West, he advises to meditate and pray (Motoyama 1992). It is unsound
psychology, even worse: it prevents people to heal themselves. Other
so-called therapists croon at every incident during the reliving that
people should forgive. The clients hardly understand what is going, they
don’t know the causes, they don’t know the consequences, but something
bad is going on, so let’s forgive and ask for forgiveness! I have
witnessed sessions that were interrupted every ten or fifteen minutes by
visualizing golden cups filled with a radiant golden liquid. Yes, your
guess is right: forgiveness to the brim.
An interesting variant
of this first school is exploring past lives by testing the arm or an
other body part. Kinesiology is using the body of the client as an
oracle. It resembles swinging the pendulum, but uses variations in
muscle tension. It is no therapy, but an interesting alternative as
induction and exploration. Ultimately, it comes down to reliving. This
method may be indicated for people who have difficulty visualizing. The
findings of kinesiologists correspond fully with experiences from
regular past-life regressions. Kinesiology has all the advantages - and
disadvantages - of consulting the subconscious by using the body. If the
conscious part is done also, the disadvantages may be compensated and
the advantages may remain.
Many therapists of the second approach
easily consult the higher self of the patient and evoke spiritual
guides. Guides may be asked if regression is permitted or useful and
what would be a good entry point. Sessions may wobble between regression
and channeling. Some therapists let their own guide communicate with
the guide of the patient. Naturally, many sessions are about the
deceased, including attachments. In the better sessions, guides do not
present themselves as higher beings, but as friends and acquaintances
from past lives, or a deceased family member of this life. Some
therapists working this way add - rightly - that a guide who prescribes
you what to do, is not a guide, but an intruder.
This approach
has its limits. Real neurotics cannot be helped this way, because it
contains little psychotherapy. The darker sides of human nature, and
evil, also cannot be dealt with this way. This approach is not enough
grounded for that. But pretty often it may work, and if it works, it
works simply and quickly. Especially sessions with children may be
beautiful.
A good example of the third approach to past-life
therapy is Brian Weiss’s report on the hypnotic sessions he did with one
of his patients. To his surprise, those sessions spontaneously led to
past lifetimes. In the same hypnotic condition, messages came through
from guides, which explains the title of the book: Many Lives, Many
Masters (1987). However, somebody who lacks a body is nor necessarily a
master, and it remainbs strange to find that an intelligent, critical
and well-educated psychiatrist drops his jaw when things are said from
the Beyond that range from quite reasonable to platitudes and
generalities.
More interesting is that people may be cured
dramatically, just by reliving, without any therapeutic processing.
Unfortunately, in practice this is not always the case, but it is
enlightening to have another extensive case study. This is an honest
book from a distinguished and unimpeachable psychiatrist, who reports in
wonder, but truthfully about an experience that went against the grain
of his profession. A convincing book from a courageous man.
An
example of the forth approach is the oldest known form of regression
therapy: dianetics of L. Ron Hubbard (1950). All episodes of lessened
consciousness, physical or emotional pain lead to engrams, as he calls
them. Identifying and repeated reliving of those engrams leads to
discharge. His ideas resemble those of Columbus: obstinate
misconceptions, but epoch-making results. Like many pioneers, his
significance is more in opening new territory than in developing a handy
conceptual framework. His methods are rigid, probably effective, but
inefficient. Intense opposition against his approach has led to a
self-contained empire of cleared people, maintaining itself with the
ample proceeds of the time-consuming clearing of others. Out of
dianetics came scientology, operating under duress. Scientology is a
bastion, formed by a religious denomination, by copyrights on each
sentence, and a tenacity resembling Jehovah’s Witnesses. Scientologists
don’t canvass at your doorstep, but harass you by mail. Let’s describe
briefly the therapy of Ron Hubbard without the jargon, and without fully
justifying his methodology.
The remigrant or patient holds in
his hands two tin cans or other electrodes connected to an E-meter,
measuring skin resistance. The therapist, called auditor, keeps track of
the meter. The auditor counts back in time, till he hits a traumatic
episode, indicated by the E-meter showing lower skin resistance. He
dates this period precisely and establishes its duration precisely. By
questioning, he clarifies the initial situation. He asks the remigrant
what he sees. From an often insignificant detail he develops the
situation in full. Then he asks the remigrant to go over the whole
episode in his mind. The E-meter shows to what extent this is done
effectively. Then he asks to tell the experience. Usually, emotions have
lessened somewhat in the telling, but did not discharge completely. He
has the agony traversed many times till the remigrant remains completely
calm. The auditor then asks if there is another situation linked to
this one, which has to be traversed. If the E-meter shows a reaction
(similar to the use of finger signals), he searches for those other
episodes and processes them likewise.
Often the remigrant blocks.
He prefers to avoid an experience, doesn’t see anything, impressions
remain vague or he glosses over things. So the engram is not released.
Questions that open the engram are: 'what can you sense? What precisely
do you see? What can you confront? What can you be responsible for?'
Many
engrams are anchored in postulates: the conclusions and decisions we
used to deal with the situation. Examples are: “It isn’t really
happening.” Or: “I will nevermore show how I feel.” Remigrants can
recount an episode in four or five versions before they recount what
really happened, what they really did. Even then, processing may be
incomplete because the embedded postulates still have to be resolved.
Hubbard’s
procedures are strict. The auditor has the remigrant recount a
traumatic episode till the E-meter shows no reflections anymore. Hubbard
gives several examples of the tenacity of scientologists, including one
case of forty hours working at one situation (Hubbard 1958).
Later
approaches that connect past-life therapy to behavioral therapy, are in
one respect even more primitive: discharge is sought by mere
repetition, while scientology stresses confronting the situation and
taking responsibility, be it in a mechanical way.
Stanislav Grof
is an example of the fifth, cathartic approach. Typical for Grof’s
approach is strongly somatic induction (forced breathing) and strongly
somatic processing. Other therapists stress mental processing:
understanding and reinterpreting. Often a therapy has positive effects,
but takes long or leads to inconclusive results, because mental
processing was neglected, or the reverse: because somatic processing was
neglected. Occasionally, mental processing and somatic processing have
both been done while the emotions have been neglected. Lasting catharsis
presupposes that work has been done and results have been booked on
four levels: mental, sensory, emotional and physical. Well-known
examples of this fifth school are Morris Netherton, Roger Woolger and
Hans TenDam.
According to Ron Hubbard (1958) 82% of people
clearly improve psychologically and physically after past-life therapy.
General belief or disbelief in reincarnation has no influence on its
success. The only condition is that apparent experiences from other
times are accepted as meaningful subjective material, without
continuously wondering about their objective truth. Several studies show
that past-life regressions diminished psychotism scores, and enhanced
the reality perception scores of patients. Also extraversion increases,
another indication that reality orientation improves.
Rabia Clark
writes that therapists report most often success with relationship
problems and phobias, and the least success with obesity, addictions and
depression. Brian Weiss found (1993) the success rate increasing from
50% to 70% by careful intake and by carefully connecting past-life
experiences to (childhood) experiences in this lifetime.
Success
certainly is not only a question of the right methods. Past-life
therapy, like most psychotherapy, is more than applying skills; it also
depends on the person of the therapist. A good therapist is weathered
and mild, all friendliness and scars.
Suggested reading
Early
works. Ron Hubbard wrote Dianetics (1950), a thick and controversial
book of somebody who became even more controversial since. For the
practicing professional, study of this work is a must, despite the
prolixity and obstinacy that seem to be inherent in pioneering works.
Hubbard’s later book about past-life regressions (1958) is the opposite
of prolix, but unfortunately badly organized and presented.
One
of the first books about the relationship between past lives and
therapy, from Inácio Ferreira (1955) is interesting to read, but at the
same time disappointing, Mediums identify the causes of eleven
psychiatric cases in past lives. The cases seem valid and the
restimulations in the present life are interesting and credible. What is
being done with that? Absolutely nothing. This is no precursor of
past-life therapy. Karl Muller (1970) later gives many examples of
spiritist past-life therapy, mainly about karmic obsessors.
Another
early book is that of Denys Kelsey and Joan Grant (1967), but they do
not give examples from sessions. Kelsey’s new book, posthumously
published, does (Kelsey 2007).
Works in English. Past-life
therapy really starts in 1978 with the now classical works of Edith
Fiore and Morris Netherton. Another good read is the book by Glenn
Williston & Judith Johnstone (1983). Florence Wagner McClain (1986)
wrote a practical and informative brochure, an almost ideal introduction
to regression therapy for potential clients. The only objection is that
she suggests that anybody can experiment with regressions and that
guidance is just knowing what questions to ask. Joel Whitton (1986) is
interesting and illuminating, especially about the intermission period,
but uses classical hypnotic induction and classical psychiatry and
hardly offers specific methodology.
Past-Life Therapy in Action by Dick Sutphen and Lauren Taylor (1987) is the best presentation of Sutphen’s way of working.
Roger
Woolger wrote one of the best books on past-life therapy (1987). He
makes it crystal clear that regression is only the beginning of therapy.
The
first, already mentioned, book by Brian Weiss (1988) was the report of a
psychiatrist that stumbled into past lives. His second book (1993) is
already much more interesting. His colleague Robert Jarmon is a
psychiatrist who likewise discovered past lives by accident. Though the
regression techniques and insights in the whole process remain somewhat
superficial, we have her a true, professional therapist at work. Also
interesting is that he intersperses regression cases with other cases
from his practice as a medical doctor and a psychiatrist, like
near-death experiences and psychic experiences of non-psychic people.
Good stories, well told (Jarmon 1997). A third American psychiatrist,
who stumbled into past lives and wrote about her findings, is Shakuntala
Modi. She gives interesting statistics of her therapy practice (1997).
Garrett
Oppenheim gives good examples of therapies (1990). Winafred Lucas wrote
and edited two volumes in which she has ten therapists explain their
way of working (1993). A must for the practicing therapist!
Rabia
Lynn Clark wrote her doctoral thesis on past-life therapy (1995). She
inventorizes how past-life therapists work, what they work on, how long
and with what results. Hans TenDam wrote Deep Healing (1996) and Andy
Tomlinson recently described his therapy work and its consequences
(2006).
Works in German. The first German past-life therapist who
published, was Thorvald Dethlefsen (1976). Werner Koch is an other
therapist, apparently experienced, but posturing as if he invented
past-life therapy (1992). Far better are the books by the Swede Jan-Erik
Sigdell (1993, 2006) who worked many years from Switzerland and now in
Slovenia. Good reads are the books by Ulrich Kramer (2006). Marianne
Carolus explains past-life therapy in anthroposophical terms (2006).
This text is an abbreviation and an update of chapter 16 in Hans TenDam’s Exploring Reincarn ation (2003).





Lanterdweg 15
Comments (0)
There are no comments.
Post a comment